USPTO serial 79044458
LAMARQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3449848Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAMARQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver E. Todd, Jr.
Oliver E. Todd, Jr. MacMillan, Sobanski & Todd, LLCOne Maritime Plaza5th FloorToledo, OH 43604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools and hand implements, namely, files and buffers for abrading, polishing and smoothing; nail files, foot files, nail clippers, nail buffers, cuticle pushers, cuticle nippers, tweezers, pincers, nail and cuticle scissors, all for use in manicure and pedicure; nail and foot files provided with replaceable operative surfaces; nail file replacement strips for use as the operative surfaces of nail files and being impregnated with or having a coating of perfumed substances; nail file replacement strips for use as the operative surfaces of nail files and being roller-coated or spray-coated with perfumes or scents; vitamin-enhanced strips for use as the operative surfaces of nail files; depilatory appliances; cases and pouches for manicure and pedicure instruments; manicure and pedicure sets and kits | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |