Drawing for RUNNINGBALL

USPTO serial 79044475

RUNNINGBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUNNINGBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038TelecommunicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Sporting and cultural activitiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 25, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 1, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance