Drawing for CORTE CONTI CAVALLI

USPTO serial 79044484

CORTE CONTI CAVALLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORTE CONTI CAVALLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD M. GOLDBERG

RICHARD M. GOLDBERG GOLDBERG PATENT LAW OFFICE25 EAST SALEM STREETSUITE 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, sparkling wines, grappaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 12, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 28, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 17, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 19, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 6, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance