Drawing for VV VALENTINA CERAMICAS

USPTO serial 79044494

VV VALENTINA CERAMICAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VV VALENTINA CERAMICAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials (non-metallic); non-metallic transportable buildings; monuments, not of metal; coverings, not of metal, for building; glazed ceramic tiles and paving blocks, not of metal; building timber and semi-worked timber; parquet flooring, parquet floor boards, loose flooringSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance