Drawing for Serial No. 79044513

USPTO serial 79044513

Serial No. 79044513

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3591370Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2009
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79044513?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ursula B. Day

Ursual B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Structural parts of machines, namely, conveyor belts, sieve conveyor belts, support belts, filter round plates, filter cartridges, filter cylinders, sieve cylinders and sieves, each made from wire cloth and wire grids; filters being parts of machines or motors; pressure leaf filters being machine parts for solid and liquid separation; mechanical filter presses being machine parts for use in the paper industry, the waste and refuse industry and the sewage industry; horizontal vacuum belt filters being machine parts for filtration of slurries, namely industrial, chemical and mineral sludge; filters being machine parts, namely, filters for filtering sand; machines for use in the food industry, namely, pulp washers and pulp filters; thickening machines, namely, sludge thickeners and sludge thickeners utilizing internal rakesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 23, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 23, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 27, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance