Drawing for BAGUE DE NAISSANCE

USPTO serial 79044542

BAGUE DE NAISSANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAGUE DE NAISSANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys; jewellery, precious stones; timepieces and chronometric instruments; coins; works of art of precious metal; jewellery cases or boxes of precious metal; watch cases, straps, chains, springs or glasses; fancy key rings; statues or figurines (statuettes) of precious metal; clock and watch cases; medalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 13, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 1, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance