Drawing for EXCESS

USPTO serial 79044604

EXCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3502019Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 16, 2008
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with EXCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert S. Weisbein

Robert S. Weisbein Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600Washington HarbourWashington, DC 20007-5109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting apparatus, namely, lamps, [ floor lamps, lamp glasses, electric Chinese lanterns, lanterns for lighting, ] ceiling lights, [ lamp shades, lamp globes, ] electric lampsACTIVE—
021Glass receptacles in the nature of [ bowls, ] drinking glasses, [ mugs, not of precious metal, table plates, not of precious metal, non-electric candelabras, not of precious metal, ] vases not of precious metal, carafes, pitchers, candle holdersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 9, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 18, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 24, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 24, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 17, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 17, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance