Drawing for PURISME

USPTO serial 79044614

PURISME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3580653Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2009
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURISME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

Thilo C. Agthe WUERSCH & GERING LLP100 WALL STREET 10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011[ [ Apparatus for lighting, namely, ceiling and wall lights; ] apparatus for cooking, namely, electric rice cookers and convection ovens; refrigerators, hair dryers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012[ Vehicles, namely, apparatus for locomotion by land, air and water, namely, boats, cars, airplanes, bicycles ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
014Jewellery [, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
016Stationery, namely, letter openers, paper knives [, ballpoint pens, felt tip markers, fountain pens ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018[ Travelling bags, ] handbags, [ schoolbags, wheeled shopping bags, suitcases, ] wallets [, walking sticks ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020[ Furniture, namely, [ tables, chairs, stools ] * bar stools, office stools, lounge chairs, deckchairs, office chairs, garden furniture, garden chairs, folding chairs, armchairs, upholstered armchairs, chairs made of sailcloth, basket chairs, cantilever choirs, hanging chairs, side tables, office tables, coffee tables, living-room tables, folding tables * ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021[ Household and kitchen utensils and containers, namely, pots, vases for flowers, wine buckets, trays [, beverage glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes, namely, mugs, earthenware basins and bowls ] ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025[ Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, caps, and coats; footwear, namely, sandals ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
034Smokers' articles, namely, tobacco pipesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Industrial design, [ interior designs, ] design of high end luxury carbon products and accessories, namely, sculptures, office supplies, toys, clothing [ and furniture components, ] and jewelrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 31, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 8, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 20, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 20, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 201571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 20, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2014A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 19, 2014TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 19, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 19, 2014CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 2014AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Jun 17, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Nov 21, 2013PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2013LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance