USPTO serial 79044615
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PORT MELBOURNE VIC 3207, AU
PORT MELBOURNE VIC 3207, AU
PORT MELBOURNE VIC 3207, AU
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparation; liquid soaps for hands and face; skin exfoliators, toners, cleansers and moisturisers; hair care cream and lotions; hair gel; shampoos; conditioners; non-medicated toiletries; anti-perspirants and deodorants for personal use, shaving preparations; after-shave; soaps; perfumery, eau de toilette; incenses; essential oils, cosmetics; dentifrices; bath oils, bath salts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 12, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |