USPTO serial 79044628
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne Abelman
Julianne Abelman Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic preparations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |