USPTO serial 79044668
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lantmännen Unibake Londerzeel NV
B-1840 LONDERZEEL, BE
Lantmännen Unibake Londerzeel NV
B-1840 LONDERZEEL, BE
Lantmännen Unibake Londerzeel NV
B-1840 LONDERZEEL, BE
Lantmännen Unibake Denmark A/S
DK
Lantmännen Unibake Londerzeel NV
BE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, croissant, lemon croissants, raisin bread and raisin croissants, chocolate croissants, almond croissants, filled croissants, chocolate bread, all of the aforementioned goods both fresh and deep-frozen | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |