USPTO serial 79044678
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Waldkirch, DE
DE
DE
Denzlingen, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
John J. O'Malley Volpe and Koenig, P.C.30 South 17th StreetSuite 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Connectors and metallic branching pieces, namely, t-fittings and y-fittings of metal, branching tubes of metal for pipelines and cables, branch sleeves of metal, power cable fittings, branching sockets and boxes of metal; metal cable clips | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Screw plugs for electrical apparatus, for tools and distribution cubicles; electric plugs; globe joints for electrical purposes, namely, sealing ends, lead and line connectors, cable joints, cable glands, cable grommets; reducers and extensions for electric lines, namely, coupling sleeves, cable sleeves and transition sleeves | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Plumbing fittings, namely, taps and valves for heating and sanitary installations, namely, stop, drain and evacuation valves; bushings for use in the HVAC and plumbing industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Electrical installation equipment, namely, plastic connectors and screw connectors for cables and flexible pipes, namely, cable protection hoses, protective cable conduits, lead and line connectors, conduit unions, industrial plug devices and round plug-in connectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic connectors; plastic branching pieces, namely, t-fittings and y-fittings of plastic, branching tubes of plastic for pipelines and cables, branch sleeves of plastic, power cable fittings, branching sockets and boxes of plastic; plastic cable clips | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |