USPTO serial 79044685
PETLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3540486Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 2, 2008
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PETLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PETLAS LASTIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Kirsehir, TR
Other trademarks owned by PETLAS LASTIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
PETLAS LASTIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PETLAS LASTIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
PETLAS LASTIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by PETLAS LASTIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
Otto O. Lee Intellectual Property Law Group LLP1871 The Alameda, 2nd Floor Suite 250San Jose, CA 95126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Tires for land vehicle wheels, tubeless tires for land vehicles [, inner tubes for pneumatic vehicle tires, repair outfits for inner tubes comprised of adhesive rubber patches for repairing inner tubes for vehicle tires and tire inflators, adhesive rubber patches for repairing inner tubes for vehicle tires, valves for vehicle tires ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PETLAS LASTIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by PETLAS LASTIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by PETLAS LASTIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named PETLAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 9, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |