Drawing for GRAND TEATRO LA FENICE

USPTO serial 79044710

GRAND TEATRO LA FENICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAND TEATRO LA FENICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery, cosmetics, lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Optical apparatus and instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
014Precious metals, jewellery, precious stones, horological instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Leather, trunks, travelling bags, umbrellasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Education, entertainment, eventsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 17, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance