USPTO serial 79044732
HIFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3647638Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HIFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lancashire, GB
Lancashire, GB
Lancashire, GB
BELEGGINGSMAATSCHAPPIJ SETIO B.V.
NL
Vimercate (MB), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zachary A. Aria
Zachary A. Aria Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Industrial metal hoses and industrial metal flexible hoses; metal pipes and metal flexible pipes; metal tubing and metal flexible tubing; metal hose, pipe and tube fittings; metal hose, pipe and tube couplings; metal hose, pipe and tube connectors ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [ Power transmission belt for machines; power transmission pulleys for machines; power transmission belt and chain tensioners for machines; power transmission roller chains for machines; power transmission sprockets and belt and chain tensioners for machines; roller bearings for machines; electric power tools, namely, routers, circular saws; hydraulic power tools, namely, routers, circular saws; pneumatic power tools, namely, routers, circular saws; hydraulic pistons for use in hydraulic hoses and industrial hoses, not for use as shaft couplings for machines; cylinders for hydraulic machines; valves for hydraulic machines, namely, valves for pumps, servo-valves, pump control valves, ball valves being parts of machines, not for use as shaft couplings for machines; hydraulic motors for machines; hydraulic accessories, namely, hydraulic valve actuators; pneumatic pistons for use in hydraulic hoses and industrial hoses, not for use as shaft couplings for machines; cylinders for pneumatic machines; valves for pneumatic machines, namely, valves for pumps, servo-valves, pump control valves, ball valves being parts of machines, not for use as shaft couplings for machines; pneumatic motors for machines; pneumatic accessories, namely, pneumatic controls for machines, motors and engines; conveyor belts; conveyor rollers; all of the foregoing not for machining operations ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Non-metal hoses for plumbing not for use as elastomeric seals for the interior of conduits; non-metal pipes and tubing not for use as elastomeric seals for the interior of conduits; non-metal flexible hoses for plumbing not for use as elastomeric seals for the interior of conduits; non-metal flexible pipes and tubing not for use as elastomeric seals for the interior of conduits; rubber hoses for industrial applications not for use as elastomeric seals for the interior of conduits; rubber tubing and pipes not for use as elastomeric seals for the interior of conduits; non-metal fittings, couplings and connectors for plumbing hoses, pipes and tubing; rubber sheets; plastic sheet material for construction and general use; plastic sheeting for use as drop cloths | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNLOP HIFLEX UK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DUNLOP HIFLEX UK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DUNLOP HIFLEX UK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BELEGGINGSMAATSCHAPPIJ SETIO B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by ALFA GOMMA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named HIFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |