USPTO serial 79044735
MEC-MOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3499356Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 2008
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MEC-MOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-25135 BRESCIA, IT
I-25135 BRESCIA, IT
BRESCIA, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie E. Sternberg
Jamie E. Sternberg Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Dyeing machines; hot air drying machines for textiles; knitting machines; portable rotary steam presses for fabrics; chemical fiber spinning machines; yarn warping machines; printing machines for textiles; embroidery machines; hosiery looms; lace making machines and implements, namely, stitch markers; hosiery knitting machines and implements, namely, stitch gauges; spinning wheels and frames, namely, chemical fiber spinning machines, spinning boxes for open-end rotor spinning machines; automatic power weaving looms; sizing machines for use in the manufacture of textiles; electric clothing pressing machines in the nature of pressing machines to make fabric appear satin-like; carding machines; wire drawing machines; power-operated reels for weaving looms; bobbins for weaving looms; slides for knitting machines; carriages for knitting machines; thread twisting machines; threading machines; loom shafts; looms being machines; tambours for embroidery machines; industrial sewing machines ] *Knitting machines; hosiery knitting machines and implements, namely, stitch gauges* | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [Preparing and placing advertisements for others; sample distribution; organization of trade exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; publication of publicity texts; business management and organization consultancy; marketing research] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |