Drawing for PURISOFT

USPTO serial 79044740

PURISOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3623083Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 19, 2009
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PURISOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah M. Robertson

Sarah M. Robertson DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1301 Avenue of the AmericasFloor 13NEW YORK, NY 10019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Active principles obtained from natural, vegetable [, marine, animal, synthetic and biotechnological ] extracts and intended to be included in the composition of cosmetics and personal hygiene goods, namely, peptidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 17, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 13, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 13, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 19, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 5, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 12, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 16, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 9, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 9, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 9, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 15, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 11, 2008RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Jun 11, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance