Drawing for 3D PROGRESS

USPTO serial 79044751

3D PROGRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3531211Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 11, 2008
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with 3D PROGRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. Goldberg

Richard M. Goldberg Goldberg Patent Law Office25 East Salem StreetSuite 419Hackensack, NJ 07601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009INTRA-ORAL CAMERAS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL ACQUISITION OF TEETH AND DENTAL ARCH SHAPE; INTRA-ORAL SCANNERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 25, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 23, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 11, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 22, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 29, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance