USPTO serial 79044824
KIDDO KIDKEEPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3725635Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 15, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIDDO KIDKEEPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M SLATTERY
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, photographic, optical, signaling, checking, emergency life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic transmitters and receivers used to locate lost children; apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound or images; alarms and alarm instruments, namely, personal security alarms; whistle alarms, namely, whistle burglar alarms; and sensors for detecting temperatures, distances and positions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |