USPTO serial 79044826
CUTIPOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUTIPOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery products | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Furniture, related parts and accessories not included in other classes; mirrors, picture frames; products, not included in other classes of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers (not of precious metal or coated therewith); glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |