USPTO serial 79044863
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CH
CH
CH
Biel/Bienne, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Hargis
Michael S. Hargis Stites & Harbison, PLLC250 W. Main Street, Suite 2300Lexington, KY 40507United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Gold and its alloys, finished and semi-finished, for dental use; alloys and brazing alloys for dental prostheses; amalgam and mercury for dental use; ceramic materials for dental use and synthetic materials for dental use for fillings | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | [ Brazing alloys of common metals for industrial use; rough products, namely, wires, rods, sticks, bars, ingots, sheets, all these goods of metal including those from alloy steel and titanium; semi-finished products of metal, namely, steel in the form of sheets, plates, foils, coils, and pipes; semi-finished products made of common metals, namely, ironmongery, namely, bolts, screws; finished products made of common metals, namely, wires, rods, sticks, bars, bolts, screws, pin screws, clips, springs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical and dental apparatus for implantations, particularly dental implantations; instruments and auxiliary instruments for medical or dental treatment use, namely, drills, medical, surgical and dental cutters for cutting human tissue, shavers, screwdrivers and instruments for activating slide attachments, screw and rotative elements, bars, endodontics instruments, supports and the like for holding instruments for molding and/or brazing; instruments and auxiliary instruments for medical or dental laboratories; dental implants; attachments and slide attachments for dental prostheses; anchors for dental prostheses, resilient anchors for dental prostheses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | [ Precious metals; precious metal alloys for jewellery; precious metal alloys for industrial use; semi-worked jewellery; jewellery; precious stones; watch cases ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing services for others in the field of medical and dental apparatuses, instruments and articles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of design and development for others of medical and dental apparatuses and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |