Drawing for KYB

USPTO serial 79044904

KYB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3606170Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 14, 2009
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with KYB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Brooke

Thomas W. Brooke Holland & Knight LLP800 17th Street, NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Cutter loaders; rock drills; truck cranes; concrete mixers; power jacks; hydraulic jacks; winches; disintegrators for chemical processing; agitating machines for chemical processing; mixing or blending machines for chemical processing; rice and barley polishing machines; agricultural machines, namely, agricultural seed planting machines, cultivators, harvesters, disk harrow; food mixing machines for commercial use; food peeling machines for commercial use; dish washing machines for industrial purposes; food cutting, chopping and slicing machines for commercial use; hydraulic actuators being machine elements not for land vehicles; cylinders, namely, machine elements not for land vehicles, used for building and construction machines and agricultural machines; reduction gears being machine elements not for land vehicles; hydraulic speed change gears being not for land vehicles; power transmissions and gearings for machines being machine elements not for land vehicles; shock absorbers being machine elements not for land vehicles; oil buffers being machine elements not for land vehicles; disc brakes, being machine elements not for land vehicles; brake pads, being machine elements not for land vehicles; brakes, being machine elements not for land vehicles; piston pumps, vane pumps and gear pumps; relief ball valves and check ball valves, being machine elements not for land vehicles; lawnmowers; waste crushing machines; ropeways for cargo or freight handling; ram tensioners for ships, namely, a power operated lift used to transport cargo between ships; steering pumpsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 4, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 4, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 1, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 17, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 19, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 27, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 29, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 2, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2008ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2008CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 28, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 6, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance