USPTO serial 79045021
COMBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for various purposes; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles, namely, transmission belts, gears and other parts for machines; agricultural machines other than operated, namely, cultivators, harvesters, disk harrows, seeders; and incubators for eggs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for all types of lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Building construction; repair of building components; and installation of building components | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STIBBE PARTICIPATIES B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Comber S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by COMBER PROCESS TECHNOLOGY S.R.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named COMBER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |