USPTO serial 79045033
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devasena Reddy
Devasena Reddy HM Law Group LLP19925 Stevens Creek BlvdSuite 100Cupertino, CA 95014| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultancy; business administration; business management consultancy; business surveys; marketing research; marketing studies; business analysis of financial statements | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | [ Training in the use of business intelligence software tools and best practices, namely, computer software development; arranging and conducting of educational conferences; arranging and conducting of education events, namely, educational and cultural exhibitions; educational services, namely, conducting workshops, seminars, instruction and educational congresses in the field of business intelligence computer software tools and best practices, namely, computer software development ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software programming; technical consultancy in the field of computer programming; technical analysis and surveys, namely, technical surveying; quality control for others; computer project management services, namely, technical project management, namely, for design and Implementation of business intelligence computer software and computer processes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |