Drawing for MAYATO

USPTO serial 79045033

MAYATO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3576356Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 17, 2009
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAYATO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Devasena Reddy

Devasena Reddy HM Law Group LLP19925 Stevens Creek BlvdSuite 100Cupertino, CA 95014

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultancy; business administration; business management consultancy; business surveys; marketing research; marketing studies; business analysis of financial statementsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041[ Training in the use of business intelligence software tools and best practices, namely, computer software development; arranging and conducting of educational conferences; arranging and conducting of education events, namely, educational and cultural exhibitions; educational services, namely, conducting workshops, seminars, instruction and educational congresses in the field of business intelligence computer software tools and best practices, namely, computer software development ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer software programming; technical consultancy in the field of computer programming; technical analysis and surveys, namely, technical surveying; quality control for others; computer project management services, namely, technical project management, namely, for design and Implementation of business intelligence computer software and computer processesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 19, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 20, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 17, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 21, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 23, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 18, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 18, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 201571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 18, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 12, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 8, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 22, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2008NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jul 11, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance