USPTO serial 79045066
ENFUCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3598615Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENFUCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Batteries; printed batteries; batteries manufactured by a printing process [ ; Electronic tags for goods, namely, smart tags and electronic tags for processing, smart labels and electronic labels for processing; semi-active and active RFID tags; blank smart and magnetic cards for the processing, transmission and reception of data; integrated circuit cards; blank electronic chip cards, wireless sensor cards for logging, monitoring, processing, transmission and reception of data, audio and visual information ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enfucell Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Enfucell Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by SoftBattery Finland Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Enfucell Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ENFUCELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |