USPTO serial 79045108
HILTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HILTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrin Lewertoff and Leslie K. Mitchell
Katrin Lewertoff and Leslie K. Mitchell Arent Fox LLP1675 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal fastening, metal joining, metal insulation and metal installation components, namely, threaded studs, nails, screws, plugs, anchors, rivets, cramps, hooks, ring-shaped fittings, pipe couplings, pipe collars, flanges, brackets, insulation anchors and angle brackets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machine tools for working stone, masonry, metal and wood, in the nature of electrically powered, powder-actuated, gas-operated, pneumatic and combustion type tools, namely, powder-actuated tools for threaded studs and nails, powder-actuated tacking tools in the nature of fasteners for heavy duty steel and metal applications, power-operated screwdrivers, power-operated drilling machines, power-operated drill hammers, power-operated breakers in the nature of hydraulic hammers, pneumatic hammers, and powered hole openers used to enlarge holes in the ground, power-operated diamond coring and cutting machines, power-operated chiseling hammers, power-operated saws, power-operated slitting and cutting machines, power-operated grinders; spare parts and accessories for the aforementioned machines and tools, namely, tool and machine suspensions in the nature of tool and machines stands, drive units, drill bits, diamond drill bits, core drilling bits, chucks for power drills, saw blades, grinding discs, cutting discs and bits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated tools and implements and their components parts, namely, dispensers, namely, adhesive dispensers, foam dispenser and sealant dispensers for use in the construction industry for applying and injecting liquid, pasty and solid masses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Measuring, signalling, inspecting, aligning, positioning and controlling apparatus and instruments, namely, angle viewfinders, distance measuring apparatus, instruments for measuring length, laser measuring systems, laser rangefinders, lasers for measuring purposes, laser-beam-emitting devices which project right angles for construction purposes, length measuring gauges, level gauges, level measuring machines and metal detectors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Sealing and insulating materials; sealant compounds for joints | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Fastening, joining and installation components all made of plastic, namely, bolts, screws, clamps, nuts, hooks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hilti Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named HILTI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |