Drawing for STUBBI

USPTO serial 79045157

STUBBI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3612564Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2009
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STUBBI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole F. Barrett

Carole F. Barrett Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & RabkinThree Embarcadero Center7th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-4024

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of leather and imitation leather, namely, animal skins and hides; bags in the nature of drawstring pouches, felt pouches, leather pouches; bags and pouches for discarding chewing gum and other waste made predominantly of leather, imitation leather, felt, fabric, or canvasSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Waste disposal containers and receptacles for household use for discarding chewing gum and other wasteSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 5, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 4, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 16, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 6, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance