Drawing for EDELIGHT

USPTO serial 79045170

EDELIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3540488Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 2, 2008
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDELIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN ALUMIT

JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT, PC16830 VENTURA BLVDSUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and business management, purchasing and procurement services provided online, namely, arranging of purchasing and disposal of contracts in regard to goods for third parties in the Internet, gathering and systemization of information into computer databasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
036monetary affairs, namely, electronic transfer of moneySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of data and information via electronic mail; telecommunication services for members, namely, providing electronic mail services and providing multiple user access to databases and computer networks; providing multiple user access to information and electronic sending of data into computer networks; news agency; namely, the transmission of news items to news reporting organizations, providing multiple user access to proprietary collections of information on the Internet; transmission of information into the Internet via electronic communications networksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 26, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 25, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 3, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 3, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance