Drawing for HIT SONG SCIENCE

USPTO serial 79045181

HIT SONG SCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3561265Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 13, 2009
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIT SONG SCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nis H. Ljungman, Esquire

NILS H. LJUNGMAN, ESQUIRE NILS H. LJUNGMAN & ASSOCIATESP.O. BOX 130GREENBURG, PA 15601-0130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs containing artificial intelligence algorithms for use in analyzing characteristics in musical compositions; computer programs for analyzing characteristics in musical compositions; computer programs for use in database management; computer memoriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035compilation of information in computer databanks or computer databasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042computer programming; computer consulting; computer software rental; computer systems analysis; design of computer systems; installation of software for computers and for a computer server; design of web pages for othersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 11, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 11, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 14, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 14, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 13, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 28, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance