Drawing for HURRICOCOON

USPTO serial 79045185

HURRICOCOON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3598617Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 31, 2009
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HURRICOCOON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Linderman

John C. Linderman McCormick, Paulding & Huber, LLP185 Asylum Street, CityPlace IIHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Building elements, namely, anchors made of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Mobile protection devices, namely, arrangements not included in other classes for influencing the wind flow around and against structures, in particular buildings, for protection against storm damage, namely, spoilers, drogues, and turbulence generatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Building elements, not of metal, for protection of structures, in particular buildings, against storm damage, namely, wind shields, wind deflectors and tie-downs for the shields and deflectorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
045Consulting services in the field of windstorm damage protection of structures, in particular buildings, using wind flow control devices, shields and deflectorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 11, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 6, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 18, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 26, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 2, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance