Drawing for CODIXX

USPTO serial 79045223

CODIXX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505562Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CODIXX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE S. LONDA

BRUCE S. LONDA Norris McLaughlin P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Screens in the nature of flat panel display screens, fluorescent screens, projection screens; Computer hardware for information systems; Liquid crystal displays (LCD); High-temperature displays in the nature of electric luminescent display panels; ] Liquid crystal display components in the nature of dichroitic sheet polarizers, color polarizers, glass polarizers, and color filters [ ; 3-D video projectors; Large LED (light emitting diode) displays, LED (light emitting diode) displays ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 13, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 11, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 11, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 5, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 29, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 18, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 5, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 5, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2009CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 10, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 15, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance