USPTO serial 79045229
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Gecomwert Anstalt; c/o Schreiber & Zindel
LI
Other trademarks owned by Gecomwert Anstalt; c/o Schreiber & Zindel
Kirchstrasse 39, Vaduz, LI
LI
LI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebeccah Gan of Young & Thompson
209 Madison Street, Suite 500Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 26, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |