USPTO serial 79045237
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bharati Bakshani
RALPH H CATHCART LADAS PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018 3738UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Lenses, namely, eyeglass lenses, magnifying lenses, optical lenses, ophthalmic lenses; lenses for spectacles and for sunglasses; contact lenses; and spectacles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |