Drawing for APX BY INTERCAST

USPTO serial 79045237

APX BY INTERCAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4065169Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 2011
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APX BY INTERCAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bharati Bakshani

RALPH H CATHCART LADAS PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018 3738UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Lenses, namely, eyeglass lenses, magnifying lenses, optical lenses, ophthalmic lenses; lenses for spectacles and for sunglasses; contact lenses; and spectaclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 19, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 13, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 26, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 14, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 6, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 31, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 31, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 11, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 27, 2009OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2009OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 16, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 8, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance