Drawing for SYNAPTIC DAMPING CONTROL

USPTO serial 79045256

SYNAPTIC DAMPING CONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3616162Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 5, 2009
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNAPTIC DAMPING CONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Albert Robin

Albert Robin Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic control apparatus for motor vehicles, namely, acceleration sensors and control strategies software to reduce motor vehicle oscillation and to improve road and vehicle handlingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Apparatus for motor vehicles, namely, electronic shock absorbersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 16, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 11, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 11, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 5, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance