USPTO serial 79045319
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward Avenue, Suite 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Ready-made clothing of all types, namely, shirts, tee-shirts, pants, anoraks, parkas, bermudas, shorts, blazers, blouses, ties, trousers, jackets, hoods, pullovers, scarves, cardigans, coats, combinations, denim pants, dresses, vests, suits, jeans, jerseys, overcoats, pareos, shawls, sweaters, skirts; clothing made of linen, namely, body linen garments, linen shirts, linen tee-shirts, linen pants, linen anoraks and parkas, linen bermudas, linen blazers, linen shorts, linen blouses, linen ties, linen trousers, linen jackets, linen hoods, linen pullovers, linen scarves, linen cardigans, linen coats, linen combinations, linen dresses, linen vests, linen suits, linen jerseys, linen overcoats, linen pareos, linen shawls, linen sweaters, linen skirts; hosiery; gloves; men's furnishings, namely, men's shirts, men's tee-shirts, men's pants, men's anoraks and parkas, men's bermudas, men's shorts, men's blazers, men's ties, men's trousers, men's jackets, men's pullovers, men's scarves, men's coats, men's denim pants, men's vests, men's suits, men's jeans, men's jerseys, men's overcoats, men's shawls, men's sweaters; corsets; headgear, namely, hats, caps, cap visors, bonnets, hoods and fashion wear, namely, shirts, tee-shirts, pants, anoraks and parkas, bermudas, shorts, blazers, blouses, ties, trousers, jackets, hoods, pullovers, scarves, cardigans, coats, combinations, denim pants, dresses, vests, suits, jeans, jerseys, overcoats, pareos, shawls, sweaters, skirts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 24, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |