USPTO serial 79045339
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
MARCUS H. LUEPKE FINNEGAN HENDERSON ET AL., LLP901 NEW YORK AVENUENWWASHINGTON, DC 20001| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for the manufacture of paints; cement for mending broken articles, namely, adhesive and contact cements; waterproofing chemical compositions for cement and similar construction materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | Paints, lacquers; pigments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Sealing, namely, adhesive sealant for use in the building industry; insulating boards; insulating coatings, namely, varnishes and expanded polystyrene | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Mortars, namely, dry mixed mortar; stucco tiles; cement mixes, plaster for building purposes, plaster boards; strips of wall tiles; composite panels composed primarily of nonmetal materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |