USPTO serial 79045370
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Kitchen wares sold in retail stores for commercial use, namely, motors and engines for kitchen wares; electric tin openers; dishwashers, commercial utensil washing machines for washing kitchen utensils; electric food and beverage blenders; electric food slicers; electric mills for household purposes; blending mixers in the nature of electric food and beverage mixers and food processors; electric food mincers; rasping machines in the nature of electric food graters; electric kitchen machines, namely, bone saws, hamburger presses, hand-chipping machines for cutting vegetables, meat mincers, pizza dough formers, electric salad driers, vacuum packing machines, vegetable peeling and grating machines, and electric ice crushers; electric knives; moulds for use in the manufacture of kitchen machines for industrial use; electric fruit and vegetable peelers; presses in the nature of electric juicers; electric coffee grinders, electric food grinders for industrial use; bottle filling machines; electric fruit presses for domestic use; kneading machines; electric machines, namely, dough moulders and dough rolling machines, churning machines, juice extractors, mussel washers, vegetable rinsers, electric can openers; electric pancake-making machines; electric thermo-sealers in the nature of heat sealer machines for packaging and preserving food; and replacement structural machine parts all for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for cooking, refrigerating, drying and ventilating purposes, namely, electric fryers, electric toasters, electric pressure cookers, refrigerating and temperature reducing apparatus, namely, freezers, refrigerators and blast chillers in the nature of shock freezers for the preservation of food; electrical coffee percolators, electric coffee machines, electric heaters for heating beverage receptacles, water heaters, cooking and baking ovens, electric grills, electric griddles, electric soup kettles, electric milk heaters, microwave ovens, electric roasting spits for meat, electric deep fryers, electric and gas hot plates; air purifying apparatus and machines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |