Drawing for SAMMIC

USPTO serial 79045370

SAMMIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3853664Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 28, 2010
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SAMMIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Kitchen wares sold in retail stores for commercial use, namely, motors and engines for kitchen wares; electric tin openers; dishwashers, commercial utensil washing machines for washing kitchen utensils; electric food and beverage blenders; electric food slicers; electric mills for household purposes; blending mixers in the nature of electric food and beverage mixers and food processors; electric food mincers; rasping machines in the nature of electric food graters; electric kitchen machines, namely, bone saws, hamburger presses, hand-chipping machines for cutting vegetables, meat mincers, pizza dough formers, electric salad driers, vacuum packing machines, vegetable peeling and grating machines, and electric ice crushers; electric knives; moulds for use in the manufacture of kitchen machines for industrial use; electric fruit and vegetable peelers; presses in the nature of electric juicers; electric coffee grinders, electric food grinders for industrial use; bottle filling machines; electric fruit presses for domestic use; kneading machines; electric machines, namely, dough moulders and dough rolling machines, churning machines, juice extractors, mussel washers, vegetable rinsers, electric can openers; electric pancake-making machines; electric thermo-sealers in the nature of heat sealer machines for packaging and preserving food; and replacement structural machine parts all for the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—
011Apparatus for cooking, refrigerating, drying and ventilating purposes, namely, electric fryers, electric toasters, electric pressure cookers, refrigerating and temperature reducing apparatus, namely, freezers, refrigerators and blast chillers in the nature of shock freezers for the preservation of food; electrical coffee percolators, electric coffee machines, electric heaters for heating beverage receptacles, water heaters, cooking and baking ovens, electric grills, electric griddles, electric soup kettles, electric milk heaters, microwave ovens, electric roasting spits for meat, electric deep fryers, electric and gas hot plates; air purifying apparatus and machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 1, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 19, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 19, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 21, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance