USPTO serial 79045377
GOLDENISO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3567854Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2009
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDENISO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne M. Sterba
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | COMMON METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; METAL HYDRAULIC AND REFRIGERATION FITTINGS, NAMELY, METAL PIPES, FLEXIBLE METAL PIPES, METAL TUBE SOCKETS, METAL PIPE FITTINGS, PIPE UNIONS MADE OF METAL, METAL PIPE COUPLING AND JOINTS, TUBES OF METAL, HYDRAULIC METAL PIPE CONNECTORS, METAL FLANGES, METAL ADAPTOR FITTINGS, RING SHAPED FITTINGS OF METAL, METAL CATCHES FOR METAL PIPES; METAL SAFES; METAL ORES, NAMELY, COPPER ORES, IRON ORES, LEAD ORES, NICKEL ORES, TIN ORES AND ZINC ORES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | FLEXIBLE PIPES, NOT OF METAL, FOR USE IN HYDRAULIC APPLICATIONS; REINFORCED RUBBER PIPES; FLEXIBLE PIPES AND HOSES MADE OF PLASTIC FOR HYDRAULIC APPARATUS AND FLUID CONVEYING APPLICATIONS; HYDRAULIC HOSES MADE OF REINFORCED RUBBER AND PLASTIC AND TUBES MADE OF RUBBER FOR HYDRAULIC APPLIANCES AND FLUID CONVEYING APPLICATIONS; RUBBER TUBES AND HOSES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF HYDRAULICS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MANULI RUBBER INDUSTRIES S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MANULI RUBBER INDUSTRIES S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MANULI RUBBER INDUSTRIES S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named GOLDENISO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 18, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |