Drawing for HEAD HYBRASION

USPTO serial 79045402

HEAD HYBRASION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3537257Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 25, 2008
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEAD HYBRASION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danny M. Awdeh

Danny M. Awdeh Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL901 New York Ave., N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025ShoesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 25, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Dec 24, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 24, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 6, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance