Drawing for NANO GETTER

USPTO serial 79045406

NANO GETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3468311Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2008
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANO GETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Oliff

James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Grinding machines for chemical processing; agitating machines for chemical processing, namely, agitators for circulating liquid media; mixing and blending machines for chemical processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 4, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 11, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 30, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 17, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance