USPTO serial 79045418
WEBER FOOD ROBOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEBER FOOD ROBOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |