USPTO serial 79045435
YEAP! I DID IT.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3728467Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 22, 2009
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YEAP! I DID IT.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Cotman
RALPH WEISER Cotman IP Law Group, PLC35 Hugus Alley, Suite 210Pasadena, CA 91103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer monitors, computers, computer programs for use in database management, use as a spread sheet, word processing | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business organization consultancy; providing statistical information; compilation of information into computer databases; business marketing; marketing research in the field of socio-science; on-line marketing services; telephone marketing services provided by telephone connections; commercial and industrial management assistance; commercial information agencies; business inquiries, consultancy of consumers in commercial and business matters; sales promotion services for others; data management services, namely, information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business management on servers in computer networks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Mobile telephone services; paging services; providing user access to a global computer network; providing telecommunications connections to the Internet; providing Internet-chatrooms; computer services, namely, providing search platforms in the Internet to allow users to request content from and receive content to computer terminals; providing portals in the Internet, namely, providing internet access via broadband networks and wireless network; transfer of data by telecommunication | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing on-line seminar, coaching, educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of human resources development; Education in the field of nutritional science rendered through correspondence courses; Entertainment services, namely, providing conducting on-line computer games in the Internet; social club services, namely, arranging, organizing and hosting social events, get-togethers, and parties for club members; educational examination services; publishing of electronic journals and books on-line | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, updating of websites, design of computer software for others, design of on-line software computer systems, design of homepages and websites, installing computer software; computer consulting services, namely, developing creating computer programs for creating computer animations; computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining an online website for others to seek science-based nutritional advice; conducting scientific studies and evaluations in the field of socio-science | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ralph WIESER
- Other trademarks owned by Ralph WIESER
- Other trademarks owned by Ralph WIESER
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named YEAP! I DID IT.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 19, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | C18P | CANCELLED SECTION 18-PARTIAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | TTPR | BOARD DECISION SET ASIDE; PROCEEDING REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | C18P | CANCELLED SECTION 18-PARTIAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |