Drawing for VICTOR CONTIS "LA VIGNE, C'EST NOTRE NATURE" "THE VINE: IT'S IN OUR NATURE"

USPTO serial 79045440

VICTOR CONTIS "LA VIGNE, C'EST NOTRE NATURE" "THE VINE: IT'S IN OUR NATURE"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VICTOR CONTIS "LA VIGNE, C'EST NOTRE NATURE" "THE VINE: IT'S IN OUR NATURE"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages (except beers), cider, digesters (liqueurs and spirits), wines, spirits, alcoholic extracts or essencesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 21, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 1, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 27, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 29, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance