Drawing for CLOSED DISTILLERIES

USPTO serial 79045505

CLOSED DISTILLERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOSED DISTILLERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, ciders, digesters (liqueurs and spirits); wines, spirits, alcoholic extracts or essencesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 9, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 8, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 3, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance