USPTO serial 79045526
EB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4065170Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2011
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestia2200 Renaissance BoulevardSuite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Metal pallet and metal transfer platforms ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [ Machines for use in assembly automation, namely, conveyors, magazine handlers in the nature of machines for loading and unloading storage compartments, namely, stacking trays that act as a shield between manufacturing workstations that are used to automate material flow in printed circuit board production, pallet handling equipment for assembly automation, namely, conveyors, assembly machines and traverse machines used to automate material flow in production, and belt conveyor systems for assembly automation comprised of belt conveyors to transport products between different productions stages ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Wireless data transfer equipment, namely, electronic information receivers for telephone, audio and video, radio, satellite and telephone transmitters, radio frequency identification tag readers, radio frequency identification tags; electronics hardware, namely, network base stations comprised of a radio unit, baseband unit, power supply, antennas, filters, radio channel emulators and simulation software for modeling radio channels, ] electrical control devices, namely, electronic control units (ECUs) for automotive engine controlling; [ antennas for wireless communications apparatus, apparatus for wireless transmission of acoustic and digital information; ] computer software for management of wireless data in wireless content delivery for use in automotive electronic control units (ECUs) [ and readers, network base stations, emulators, simulators, mobile computers, navigation apparatus, ] and vehicles; computer software for operation of automation and controlling machinery; [ testing apparatus for testing operations and functions of wireless systems, radio channels, network base stations, electronic control units, mobile radio systems, and wireless communications devices; network testing equipment, namely, protocol analyzers, network load analyzers; computer operating software for servers used for wireless data transfer; control software for testing production systems in the electronics industry, namely, control software for programming, testing and measuring mobile communication devices, electronic control units, application signal processors; ] computer software for testing and programming electronic control units, [ testing manufacturing machine vision control operations and measuring production output statistics for production systems in the electronics industry; electrical, electronic and electro-mechanical measuring and testing devices, namely, electronic sensors for sensing acoustic, digital or analog video or audio signals, radio frequency waves, luminance, capacitance, power, temperature, position, ampere, hertz, volt, watt; mobile terminal production testing equipment, namely, user interface for electronic devices, ] computer software for testing functionality, quality, stability and performance of wireless network devices; all of the foregoing sold in a business-to-business environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | [ Maintenance, repair and installation of computer network systems, computer hardware systems, wireless network systems, navigation and speech recognition systems, testing systems for wireless network systems ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | [ Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services, ISDN services, wireless telephone services, wireless broadband communication services, telematic sending of information, telecommunications access services, ] data transmission [ and reception services ] via telecommunications means [ telecommunications gateway services ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | [ Treatment of materials and goods for others used in connection with production and assembly automation equipment, namely, telecommunications equipment, radio identification apparatus, and circuit boards; material processing services for the order and specifications for others ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Computer project management services for automatic production systems; scientific consulting services in the field of wireless communications and motor vehicles; ] design and development of computer hardware and software; design and testing for new product development; and quality assurance services in the field of wireless communications and motor vehicles; product testing for others; design, development, and testing of new products for others, product research; [ and ] quality assurance services all in the field of [ wireless communications, ] data transfer [ and telecommunications ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Elektrobit Oyj
- Other trademarks owned by Elektrobit Automotive GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Elektrobit Oyj
- Other trademarks owned by Elektrobit Oyj
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 28, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 28, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2022 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | RGOA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |