Drawing for A MODO MIO

USPTO serial 79045529

A MODO MIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3787525Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 11, 2010
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A MODO MIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 North Glebe Road, Suite 1100Arlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric coffee machines, electric coffee percolatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
029Milk, milk based and milk derived products, namely, milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurtSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee, coffee blends, coffee based beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 15, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 18, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 16, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 16, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance