Drawing for TOP-1

USPTO serial 79045538

TOP-1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3660992Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 28, 2009
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOP-1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER

Friedrich Kueffner LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET, 21st FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029READY-TO-USE CREAM AND READY-TO-USE CREAM MIXTURES, NAMELY, WHOLE MILK CREAM MIXTURESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030READY-TO-USE FILLINGS, COATINGS AND DECORATING MASSES, NAMELY, CREMES FOR CONFECTIONARY CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CHOCOLATE AND NUT PASTE; READY-TO-USE MIXTURES FOR FILLINGS, COATINGS AND DECORATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CHOCOLATE AND NUT PASTESECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 9, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 24, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 14, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 4, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 4, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 12, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance