Drawing for DULCO

USPTO serial 79045585

DULCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554327Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DULCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, laxatives and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of constipation for the alimentary tract and metabolismSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal-based snack foods, ready-to-eat cereals, and processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 8, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 3, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 31, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2012RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 25, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance