USPTO serial 79045609
HAREWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3666861Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 2009
- Examiner
- JORDAN, AMEETA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAREWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL MEYERTONS, HOOD, KIVLIN, KOWERT & GOETZEP.O. BOX 398AUSTIN, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial affairs, namely, financial forecasting, financial management; financial analysis; mutual funds services, namely, mutual funds brokerage, mutual fund investments; investment of funds; stock exchange price quotations; capital investment services; exchanging money; financial transaction services, namely, assisting others with the completion of financial transactions for stocks, bonds, securities and equities; monetary transactions, namely, monetary exchanges, acquisition and transfer of monetary claims; banking; financial and monetary information and advice; financial and monetary assistance services, namely, financial and monetary research and analysis | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |