USPTO serial 79045617
OTTAKRINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3591373Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with OTTAKRINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wien, AT
AT
AT
AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel Karni Schmidt
Joel Karni Schmidt Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th Street, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10036-1525United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers, including [ ale, ] lager [, stout, porter, shandy ]; low-alcohol [ and non-alcoholic beers ] as well as light beers [ ; and malt beers ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OTTAKRINGER GETRÄNKE AG
- Other trademarks owned by Ottakringer Brauerei AG
- Other trademarks owned by Ottakringer Brauerei AG
- Other trademarks owned by Ottakringer Brauerei AG
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named OTTAKRINGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PBPR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - ESU SUPERVISOR REQUEST | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |